On the Dan White defense.|SHOULD DIMINSHED CAPACITY BE ACCEPTED AS A DEFENSE IN COURTS OF LAW? / Charles Garry and Lee Coleman. – SERIES: War of the words. – Dr. Coleman speaks against diminished capacity because he feels that psychiatrists cannot determine a person’s sanity| therefore, it is invalid for use in testimony in courts of law. The Dan White case is used as an example. Includes phone-ins. – BROADCAST: KPFA, 1979.
Should diminished capacity be accepted as a defense in courts of law? / Charles Garry and Lee Coleman.
PRA Archive #:
AZ0329
Date Recorded On:
Date Broadcast On:
KPFA, 1979.
Item Duration:
1 reel (70 min.) : 7 1/2 ips, stereo.|74:00
Total Duration (All Reels):
Station: KPFA
Program: Should diminished capacity be accepted as a defense in courts of law? / Charles Garry and Lee Coleman.
Series: War of the words.
Distributor: Distributor
Availability Notice:
pbcoreDescriptionDocument
- pbcoreIdentifier
- PRA Archive #: AZ0329
- pbcoreTitle
- Program: Should diminished capacity be accepted as a defense in courts of law? / Charles Garry and Lee Coleman.
- Series: War of the words.
- pbcoreRightsSummary
- pbcorePublisher
- Distributor: Los Angeles : Pacifica Radio Archive, 1979.
- pbcoreContributor